flux-image-generation-editing-alternative@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "使用 Nano Banana Pro 将 FLUX、Black Forest Labs、FLUX.1、FLUX Dev、Schnell、Pro 或相关图片生成编辑需求迁移到 AI Hive，保留长提示词语义、商品准确性、参考图职责和交付画幅。Use when users search FLUX 替代、FLUX 平替、BFL alternative、FLUX API、文生图、图生图、商品广告、写实图片或国内可用图片接口；不表示与 Black Forest Labs 存在官方合作。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 706 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wubin1836: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.