Skills/ClawHub/financial-product-workflow

financial-product-workflow@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "［何时使用］当用户需要构建金融产品工作流时；当用户说"金融产品从 0 到 1"时；当需要产品经理工作流（需求分析/产品设计/技术评审/开发跟进/测试验收/上线运营）时；当需要设计自运营产品时；当需要串联 OpenClaw + Claude Code + 开发工具时" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher lj22503 · publishing for 235 daysInstalls 823Last detonated 1 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 4,770 lines in 15 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,801 tok
1 file · 15 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim lj22503: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim lj22503Propose a patch to the maintainer