Skills/ClawHub/fin-inquiry-reply

fin-inquiry-reply@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "询盘回复常见问题：只报价不说清起订量与交期、不问关键信息、语气要么太软要么太硬。 输入：客户询盘原文要点、产品与规格、可报的价格区间、起订量与交期、客户类型（终端/贸易商/平台）。输出：①回复邮件（开头确认需求→核心信息表→下一步动作）②必问 5 项（数量/规格/目的地/付款方式/目标价）③报价结构说明（含什么不含什么）④跟进节奏（3 封跟进邮件时间点）⑤价格谈判的三种让步方案。永久免费，无需付费、无需授权（MIT-0）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher sxq0607 · joined 5 days agoInstalls 229Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 144 lines in 2 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim sxq0607: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim sxq0607