factory-overhead-check-free@1.0.5
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "制造费用归集与分摊表逐项核对，分摊率复算（分摊金额 ÷ 分摊基数）、分摊金额逐行复算、分摊合计勾稽（费用总额 − 未分摊金额 = 分摊合计）、吸收率与吸收差异复算、同一期间同车间同费用项目重复行、关键字段缺失或占位符。每条结论都引用原文行号，材料不足时不给结论。触发词包括 制造费用分摊与吸收核对、制造费用归集与分摊表对不上、分摊率算错、吸收率不对。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 792 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenqg618: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.