Skills/ClawHub/fact-check-guard

fact-check-guard@1.0.7

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "当用户说『AI胡说八道』『内容发出去怕有错』『怎么验证模型给的事实』『引用要有出处』,或要把 agent 生成的内容(文章/报告/回复)对外发布、必须可溯源时使用。把每条关键声明当『待证主张』:对照检索来源逐条标注 已支撑/无来源/存疑,无来源的不许当事实对外。理论根基:LGD 三律(有籍·有证·有门禁)。触发词:事实核查、fact check、幻觉检测、引用溯源、内容可证、AI胡说、出处校验、grounding。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoxinghua09-cell · joined 10 days agoInstalls 572Last detonated 55 min ago

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 336 lines in 7 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,669 tok
2 files · 7 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhaoxinghua09-cellPropose a patch to the maintainer
fact-check-guard@1.0.7 safety verdict: Caution 67/100 — KillerSkills