Skills/ClawHub/expert-team

expert-team@1.0.5

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "拿不定主意时开个团:几个 AI 专家背对背各写各的(防互相带偏),再当面吵出分歧和条件式结论——不是五个人说一个意思。决策、多方案对比、文案多风格都行,先算划不划算再动手。触发词:值不值得做、怎么选、多方案对比、多角度看看、专家团。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher yysws5566 · publishing for 84 daysInstalls 0Last detonated 3 h ago
$clawhub install expert-team
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 393 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,019 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.