Skills/ClawHub/expert-insist

expert-insist@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "适用场景:用户提问包含「该怎么做」「哪个好」「利弊」「建议」「分析」「判断」「选择」「决策」「推荐」「评估」「观点」「看法」「策略」「方案」等需要输出观点的词,或用户纠正信息后需要重新给建议时。不适用:纯事实查询、任务执行、格式化输出、技术操作。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher shawn-zhou-chn · publishing for 172 daysInstalls 762Last detonated 36 min ago
$clawhub install expert-insist
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 297 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈479 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.