experience-pinned-model-id-redirect-deprecation@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Feel the quiet frustration of hidden model deprecations and learn to navigate silent substitutions without surprise. This low‑intensity, 14‑step narrative unfolds over 1–2 weeks, guiding you through latency shifts, usage budget mismatches, and token count quirks. 模型退役的静默挫败感. Frustración por cambio." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 327 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim liveneon: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.