Skills/ClawHub/exam-recite-outline

exam-recite-outline@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "输入课本章节、课件文本，剔除冗余内容，压缩精简背诵版提纲，划分一级二级考点，标注必背简答、论述题答题模板。上传课件 / 教材文字，输出轻量化背诵提纲：剔除废话只保留得分关键词，分名词解释、简答、论述三类整理，配套标准答题模板，大幅缩减背诵内容。期末背诵、背诵提纲、考点压缩、简答论述模板、名词解释清单、开卷闭卷速背，或上传课件/教材要求整理考试背诵稿。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher cryptocxf · joined 10 days agoInstalls 304Last detonated 1 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 370 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈706 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim cryptocxf: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim cryptocxfPropose a patch to the maintainer