Skills/ClawHub/exam-prep-pro

exam-prep-pro@1.4.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "职业考试智能备考工具包。当用户提到备考、考试、刷题、复习、公务员、法考、CPA、注册会计师、教师资格、建造师、考研、职业资格、考试规划、学习计划、高频考点、错题、冲刺、模拟题等任何与职业考试备考相关的需求时使用此技能。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher mcheisenberg · publishing for 135 daysInstalls 702Last detonated 2d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,674 lines in 15 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈880 tok
1 file · 15 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim mcheisenberg: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim mcheisenbergPropose a patch to the maintainer