exam-paper-error-analysis@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "全学科错题分析技能，提供单题深度分析、整卷失分分析、变式题生成、错题分类讲评四大能力。 支持文字/文件输入（图片、PDF等，PDF自动转图片后使用多模态模型识别，不使用本地OCR）。 覆盖基础教育和职业教育（机电、计算机、会计、护理、汽修、建筑、旅游、电商等）8+专业。 触发场景：上传错题/试卷要求分析、要求出变..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 682 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim flyboat403: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.