Skills/ClawHub/ex-clapback-writing-style

ex-clapback-writing-style@1.0.1

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Use when 需要以"前任回怼写作风格"写中文社交媒体文案(微博/小红书/朋友圈体),即一种"前任视角+反讽撒娇+富豪/创业者对象+日常荒诞细节"的叙事风格,表面深情款款、实则句句带刺。适用于分手文学、人设解构、前任反讽段子、甜丧文案。触发词:前任回怼、回怼文案、反讽撒娇体、富豪前任叙事、分手文学、人设解构。合规硬约束:输出一律使用虚构人物与泛化代称,禁止真实人名及可识别事件,不复制原文。不适用于纯冷叙述/零度叙事长文(用 justin-writing-style)与煽情营销/演讲稿/论文。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher qomob · publishing for 125 daysInstalls 394Last detonated 7d ago
$clawhub install ex-clapback-writing-style
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 1,461 lines in 15 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈738 tok
1 file · 15 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.