Skills/ClawHub/eval-bench-builder

eval-bench-builder@1.0.4

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "当用户说『怎么评测这个AI/技能好不好』『给我造个测试集』『评测用例怎么设计』『要可复现的评测』，或要给一个 agent/模型/技能建可复现评测基准时使用。从能力说明+边界用例生成结构化 eval 样本（输入/期望/判定标准），保证可复现、可回归。可运行脚本（bench_build 生成器）。理论根基：LGD 三律之有证（评测可复现、可核验）。触发词：评测基准、eval、测试集、benchmark、可复现评测、评测用例、怎么测AI。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoxinghua09-cell · joined 2 days agoInstalls 480Last detonated 35 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 333 lines in 8 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhaoxinghua09-cell