Skills/ClawHub/eplan-drawing-parser

eplan-drawing-parser@1.1.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "EN: Extract structured data from EPLAN/CAD vector PDF electrical drawings — component list (位号/型号/数量), wire/pin topology (导线连接、串并联、电能流向), terminal table, and title-block metadata. Uses PDF vector geometry (100% accurate, no OCR) instead of visual models. Use when the user provides an EPLAN or vector PDF electrical schematic and asks "解析EPLAN图 / 抽元件清单 / 看导线怎么连 / 提取位号型号 / parse EPLAN drawing / extract components / wire topology". 中文：从 EPLAN / CAD 矢量 PDF 电气图纸中抽取结构化数据 —— 元件清单（位号/型号/数量）、导线连接拓扑（串并联、电能流向）、端子表、标题栏。基于 PDF 矢量几何直接提取（100%准确，无OCR误差），不依赖视觉模型。当用户提供 EPLAN 或矢量 PDF 电气原理图并要求"解析EPLAN图/抽元件清单/看导线怎么连/提取位号型号"时触发。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher 727583550-coder · publishing for 80 daysInstalls 580Last detonated 6 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
File type combined with upload actionscripts/parse_eplan.py:195 · File type combined with upload action — agent may exfiltrate local data filesjson_path = args.json or os.path.join(args.out_dir, Path(args.input).stem + ".json")Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
AST07

No other findings across 1,087 lines in 10 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,065 tok
1 file · 10 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim 727583550-coder: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim 727583550-coderPropose a patch to the maintainer