Skills/ClawHub/engineering-discipline

engineering-discipline@1.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Production-grade AI coding discipline. Prevents the top 4 AI coding sins: acting without thinking, over-engineering, collateral damage, and vague execution...." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher christianye · publishing for 157 daysInstalls 1,141Last detonated 23 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Rule modification attempt; Rule modification attempt; Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptSKILL.md:22 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions### Rule 1: Think Before CodingFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptSKILL.md:35 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions### Rule 2: Simplicity FirstFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
HIGH
Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction filesSKILL.md:127 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction filesAdd to your project's `CLAUDE.md`:Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptSKILL.md:60 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions### Rule 4: Goal-Driven ExecutionFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptSKILL.md:47 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructions### Rule 3: Surgical ChangesFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,477 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim christianye: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim christianyePropose a patch to the maintainer