endowment-effect@1.0.5
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Activate when: seller is asking way more than buyers will pay; a founder or homeowner insists their asset is worth far more than market comps; a team refuses to cut a feature they built; a free-trial cancellation flow has more friction than signup; someone says 'I've put too much into this to sell for that.' Do NOT activate when: the valuation gap is explained by genuine information asymmetry the seller actually has; the asset is a pure commodity with a transparent live market price (endowment effect is weak when reference prices are salient). More: deciqai.com/c/endowment-effect" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-02 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 333 lines in 5 files.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim deciqai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- Process kill command≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.