email-and-newsletter@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Email and newsletter strategy for creators and brands — the owned-audience layer that social feeds. Use when someone wants to "start/grow a newsletter," "build an email list," "turn followers into subscribers," "should I use Substack/beehiiv/LinkedIn," "repurpose my newsletter into social (or vice versa)," or build the audience layer social can't take away. Runs email (habit) + a web archive (discovery) off the same work and loops content social<->email. Uses the INBOX framework. Reads brand-profile + voice-builder + content-pillars first. WoopSocial does NOT send email — the agent strategizes and drafts, the ESP is external and human-run, WoopSocial publishes only the social side; metrics come from the ESP + GA4, never fabricated; consent + unsubscribe required. Distinct from link-in-bio-and-traffic (capture), cross-platform-repurposing (same-moment), and lead-magnets-and-funnels (the magnet)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 424 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim social-media-skills: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.