Skills/ClawHub/edu-exam-explain

edu-exam-explain@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "学生错的往往不是题，而是某个前置概念。老师讲评时要同时讲清「为什么错」「正确思路」「换个条件还会不会」，手写讲评稿很费时间。 输入：题目原文或截图描述、正确答案、学生典型错误答案、学段学科。输出：①错误归因表（概念/审题/计算/表达四类）②正确解法的分步拆解 ③前置知识补丁清单 ④2 道同类变式题（含答案）⑤一句话学习建议。永久免费，无需付费、无需授权（MIT-0）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher sxq0607 · joined 5 days agoInstalls 231Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 143 lines in 2 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim sxq0607: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim sxq0607