Skills/ClawHub/drivethru-graphic-artist

drivethru-graphic-artist@0.18.1

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "Graphic-artist tasks for Bacon & Co decorations — (1) generate product mockups by compositing a decoration (logo/graphic) onto a blank product photo (deterministic; no model-generated pixels; self-reviewed), (2) make a DTF decoration "production-ready" / "drop the art" — take the real thumbnail, size it to the decoration location, render at 300 DPI, upload the DTF production file, set size + colors, and create a print sample, driving the decoration toward the 'done' state via the drivethru_mcp decoration_* tools, and (3) clean up degraded / AI-generated flat art before production — deterministically snap it back to its true inks, rebuild faded/broken/jagged outlines, and re-render crisp at print size (fixes the "looks fine as a thumbnail, falls apart at 13 inches" problem). Use whenever the user wants to see a logo on a garment, place artwork on a blank, remove an image background (knock a solid color out of flat art, or segment a photographic subject), tune a print's size/position, clean up / fix / "drop for production" a low-quality or AI-generated logo (ghosting, haze, jagged or fading outlines, soft edges), OR make a decoration production-ready / drop art / get a DTF decoration to done." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zmtucker · joined 5 days agoInstalls 1,919Last detonated 4d ago

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-30 and scored it 68/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/_bootstrap.py:117 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/_bootstrap.py:116 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

What would make this Verified

12 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zmtucker: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zmtucker