doc-writer@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "文档编写专家子技能。当需要编写或创建工程文档时使用:五类核心 PRD/DESIGN/ADR/PROGRESS/RETRO + 知识笔记 TECH + 三种支撑文档 PERSONA/RUNBOOK/ROADMAP,以及 14 类扩展专业模板——需求规格 REQ-SPEC、用户故事 USER-STORY、API 契约、UI 规格、业务流程、DDD 领域设计、开发规范、逆向分析、测试计划/报告、部署指南、变更日志、交接单、交付摘要,共 23 个超详细专业模板。触发词:写文档、编写 PRD、写需求规格、写设计文档、记录架构决策、写 ADR、定义 API 契约、写测试计划、写部署文档、建模板、补充文档。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 2,766 lines in 26 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zengfr: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.