dmaic-process-improvement@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "交互式 DMAIC 流程改进助手。每个阶段支持多选工具，每个工具通过一问一答完成细节；无需工具的地方也采用逐环节问答。每个环节完成后经过多专家审核确认，并输出详细文档。适用于六西格玛项目、质量分析、根本原因查找及改进固化。触发词：dmaic、流程改进、质量分析、六西格玛、交互式dmaic。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 698 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim savidwilbert: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.