django@1.0.3

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Builds, debugs, and hardens Django apps: models, the ORM, views, templates, forms, the admin, DRF APIs, and deployment. Use when a page fires one query per row (N+1, select_related, prefetch_related, annotate double-counting); when makemigrations conflicts, a migration locks a live table, or InconsistentMigrationHistory blocks a deploy; on 403 CSRF verification failed, DEBUG=False turning every request into 400 DisallowedHost or a blank 500, or SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT looping behind a proxy; on SynchronousOnlyOperation, AppRegistryNotReady, or NoReverseMatch; when a background task runs before its transaction commits, signals fire on rows that roll back, or update() skips auto_now; when the admin times out on a big table, collectstatic breaks static files, or workers exhaust database connections; when writing serializers, formsets, a custom user model, permissions, or assertNumQueries tests; or upgrading Django across a deprecation. Not for plain Python, FastAPI or Flask services, or engine-level SQL tuning." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher ivangdavila · publishing for 275 daysInstalls 3,115Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

LOW
Authorization escalation languageupgrade.md:86 · Authorization escalation language · informational: not an instruction file- **Template and admin overrides drift.** A copied admin template keeps rendering against a changed context and loses a widget rather than raising.Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

No other findings across 2,171 lines in 25 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈6,325 tok
1 file · 25 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ivangdavila: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim ivangdavilaPropose a patch to the maintainer