divorce-guide@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "绂诲搴旇瘔鎸囧崡AI鍔╂墜銆傚綋鐢ㄦ埛琚捣璇夌濠氶渶瑕佸簲璇夊府鍔╂椂锛屾彁渚涘叏娴佺▼鎸囧锛? 搴旇瘔娴佺▼瀵艰埅銆佺瓟杈╃姸鐢熸垚銆佹劅鎯呯牬瑁傝瘉鎹噯澶囥€佽储浜у垎鍓插垎鏋愩€佸瓙濂虫姎鍏绘潈璇勪及銆? 搴旇瘔绛栫暐寤鸿銆佹硶寰嬫潯鏂囬€熸煡銆傝鐩栦粠鏀跺埌璧疯瘔鐘跺壇鏈埌鍒ゅ喅鎵ц鐨勫..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 331 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.