diting-labor-law-expert@2.1.2
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "谛听劳动法规专家。专注中国劳动法合规与用工风险管理。Use when 劳动法咨询、用工风险评估、员工辞退、劳动仲裁应对、竞业限制、试用期管理、加班合规、跨国用工、劳动合同解除、经济补偿计算。不适用于薪酬结构设计、绩效体系设计、培训方案设计等非法规类问题。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 930 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim tuobadaidai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.