Skills/ClawHub/diting-ai-application-expert

diting-ai-application-expert@1.1.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "谛听AI应用专家。AI场景设计、工具选型、变革管理、数据隐私、AI政策、ROI评估。Use when AI应用落地、智能工具选型、AI变革管理、员工AI素养培训、AI安全合规、AI投资回报分析。不适用于纯技术开发、算法优化等非业务应用场景。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher tuobadaidai · publishing for 176 daysInstalls 1,375Last detonated 41 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 559 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,560 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim tuobadaidai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim tuobadaidaiPropose a patch to the maintainer