dining@2.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Dining OS v2.1——硬核膳食决策引擎。当用户面临"今天吃什么/做什么饭/点什么外卖"的决策困境时立即触发。覆盖场景：为1-N人规划下厨/堂食/外卖菜单、家庭/商务/同学聚餐方案设计、减脂增肌健身餐规划、厨艺展示选菜、露营/火锅/全素等特殊场景。核心能力：约束满足优化（忌口/过敏/健康红线）、快速盲选与..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,549 lines in 12 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenchen913: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.