dingding@2.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "钉钉群机器人工具与开放平台开发指南。Use for: (1) 用附带的零依赖 CLI 向钉钉群发通知——文本/markdown/链接卡片，支持加签安全模式和@人, (2) CI/监控/日报等自动化通知场景, (3) 钉钉开放平台 API（token/审批/通讯录）开发指导。DingTalk group-robot..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 238 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhangifonly: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.