Skills/ClawHub/did-that-actually-work

did-that-actually-work@1.0.2

VERIFIED

Publisher claims: "Did that actually work? Did my last action take effect, or did it only look like it did? Use this after any tool call whose effect matters — an exec, a write, a POST or PUT, a message send, a fetch you will build on — and before reporting success to the user. Cross-checks what the tool reported (ok/error) against what the wire showed for that same tool call: status codes (403, 5xx), empty 200 bodies, unsent uploads, no observable request at all. Returns exactly CONFIRMED, SILENT_FAILURE, UNVERIFIED or FAILED with the mismatch named. Do not use for reads you will not act on." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher aeneassoft · joined 1 days agoInstalls 275Last detonated 16 h ago
$clawhub install did-that-actually-work
WatchReport an issue

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-11-01 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only

Static findings

No findings across 146 lines in 2 files.