dexio-wiki-ingest@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Compile a source (article, paper, transcript, meeting notes, doc, dataset) into an LLM wiki with provenance: keep an immutable raw copy with a hash, update every existing page the source touches instead of writing one summary page, cite the source at each claim, and label how far each claim can be trusted. Use when adding a new source to a wiki or when asked to read something and add it to the wiki." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 122 lines in 2 files.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dexio: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.