dexio-wiki-conflicts@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Handle contradictions and outdated claims in an LLM wiki without silently overwriting: compare dates, provenance and the current system of record, replace only when one side is clearly authoritative, otherwise keep both claims side by side, mark the page contested or lower its confidence, and escalate material conflicts to a person. Use when a new source disagrees with a page, when two pages disagree, or when a fact on a page may no longer be true." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 128 lines in 2 files.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dexio: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.