design-compliance-check@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "设计走查：将生成的 HTML/CSS 页面对照设计规范文档逐项审查，输出结构化合规报告。 当用户说"设计走查"、"走查页面"、"检查是否符合设计规范"、"审查设计合规"时触发。 生成任何 HTML/CSS 页面后也可主动触发，确保输出符合设计规范。 用户可指定任意设计规范文档路径，skill 会自动读取并逐项对照检查。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 201 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim asz2864: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.