deeply@1.1.2
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "召回经权威筛选的人物针对某个判断说过的一手观点，逐字原话带日期与出处， 语料取自访谈、文章、播客转写与研报（中英混合），覆盖财经/科技/商业/思想。 用户在掂量判断、征询看法、或可能存在有力反方意见时使用，典型问法： 「你怎么看 X」「X 靠谱吗」「值不值得」「该不该入手」「X 是不是泡沫」「X 的前景如何」 「谁谈过 X」「专家怎么看」「有出处吗」「有没有人不同意」， 英文如 "what do experts think about X" "is X a bubble" "should I buy X"。 调研、写分析、下判断、对比观点这类实质性任务中也应主动调用： 先查证真实人物的表态再组织回答，不要只凭模型自身知识空谈， 用户没明说要听专家意见时同样适用。 语料池不联网：今日价格、刚发生的新闻等时效事实不在射程； 健康、玄学、情感等池外领域没有语料。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 90/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No findings across 179 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.