dedao-thinking-skills@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "得到大脑会员式的 6 合 1 文本与思考技能包,把'怎么用 AI 帮人想清楚、写清楚'拆成 6 个边界清晰的模式:润色、点评、拷问、回顾、创作、发芽。每个模式只解决一个问题,规则和禁忌都画得明明白白。当用户想要——把口语/草稿写通顺(润色)、识别自己没意识到的亮点(点评)、用直友姿态质疑方案/观点找漏洞(拷问/批..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 697 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim 156554395: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.