debate@2.4.3
VERIFIEDPublisher claims: "Cross-vendor adversarial review. WARNING — this sends your brief, and any source files you approve, to a model hosted by a THIRD-PARTY vendor, where it stays in that vendor's session history under their retention terms. Ship a plan, proposal, or design to a model from a DIFFERENT vendor to attack it; every objection carries a verifiable anchor; the defender rules with an evidence tag on each ruling; the final round classifies into still-disputed / unresolved / verified-consensus instead of forcing agreement; a fresh-session judge is mandatory whenever the outcome looks too clean. Invoke only when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review by a model from another vendor. One model role-playing several experts is not this skill." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 88/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.