data-rights-guard@1.0.5
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "当用户说『爬的数据能拿来训练吗』『数据集没写许可证』『微调数据版权合规吗』『怎么确认数据能商用』,或在用数据(爬取/购买/公开集/用户授权)做训练/微调/评测前想确认版权与许可边界时使用。把每条数据当『带权属的资产』:查许可证·商用权限·署名要求·来源可溯,缺许可的不许进训练集。理论根基:LGD 三律(有籍·有证·有门禁)。触发词:数据版权、训练数据合规、数据集许可证、版权护栏、数据权属、商用权限、data license、微调合规。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 356 lines in 8 files.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.