Skills/ClawHub/data-ab-test

data-ab-test@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "A/B 测试最常见的失败是「样本不够就下结论」「同时改了三处不知道谁起作用」。 输入：要优化什么（按钮文案/价格页/推荐策略）、当前数据量（日活/日转化）、可接受的测试周期。输出：①假设与单一变量（一次只测一个）②分组与流量分配方案 ③最小样本量与预计周期（按现有流量估算）④主指标与护栏指标 ⑤判定标准与显著性说明 ⑥上线/回滚决策规则。永久免费，无需付费、无需授权（MIT-0）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher sxq0607 · joined 5 days agoInstalls 244Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 140 lines in 2 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim sxq0607: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim sxq0607