daily-xuanzang@0.2.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Daily reading of the Great Tang Records on the Western Regions (大唐西域记) — Xuanzang's Western Journey across the Silk Road and India, all 12 fascicles (CBETA T51n2087), with auto-tracked progress, vernacular/English translation, a bilingual route map, and voice. 每日讲读《大唐西域记》——玄奘西行丝路与印度全程，逐段推进，自动追踪进度，默认配中英文路线地图、白话翻译与语音。 Triggers / 触发词: 「大唐西域记」「西域记」「玄奘西行」「daily xuanzang」「今日西域记」「继续读西域记」「xuanzang」「xiyuji」" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 7,234 lines in 25 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yumyumtum: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.