customer-service-performance@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "客服坐席绩效核算技能。读取用户提供的坐席工作量数据表与绩效规则表（Excel/CSV 均可），按可配置的多维度权重与阶梯规则逐人核算得分，输出含逐项计算过程的绩效明细表、团队分布对比与待人工复核清单。适用场景：客服绩效核算、坐席绩效、月度绩效统计、绩效评分、按规则算绩效，以及用户提供坐席数据与考核规则并希望自动核算得分的任务。核算结果供人工复核参考，不构成最终考核依据。反馈与定制联系：[email protected]" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 284 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zenobiazizi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.