curriculum-standard@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "根据人才培养方案和专业教学标准生成符合中国职业教育规范的课程标准DOCX文档。**使用时机**：当需要创建包含以下特征的职业教育课程标准时：(1) 需要制作生成编制课程标准，(2) 基于任务驱动能力目标的项目化课程内容，(3) 建设学习情境设计的课程，(4) 需要标准结构和中国教育规范格式的课程，(5) 包含职教..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 822 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim flyboat403: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.