Skills/ClawHub/cue-watchlist-digest-cn

cue-watchlist-digest-cn@0.2.24

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "自选清单日报（状态文件驱动）：把公司名或 6 位代码落成 watchlist.json，每次运行从既有域取数与上次快照做差，产出「今日新增/近端变更/需人工」日报，每条挂官方出处＋asof；同日首跑按差集给增量、再跑复用当日记账（幂等只在当日内成立）。适合「我这几只票今天有什么新公告」「回购和激励推进到哪了」这类逐日重复需求。Do NOT use for: 行情、涨跌、资金流与北向（该域未开放，以 catalog 现值为准，本件不装）、风险评分或评级、一次性历史复盘。Triggers: 自选清单日报 / 我的票今天有什么新消息 / 盯公告 / watchlist daily digest" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher huhoo · joined 12 days agoInstalls 196Last detonated 24 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-02 and scored it 63/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:61 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codeFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/check_digest.py:461 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/check_digest.py:524 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/check_digest.py:606 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

What would make this Verified

17 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim huhoo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
  3. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
  4. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim huhoo