cue-skill-review-cn@0.1.3
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "skill 体检报告起草:输入是一枚待装的 skill(本地目录,或商店页/仓库页经解析通道取回的正文),产出是五节报告——被检对象、逐条发现(每条一个 [S#])、未取到与口径、来源(带 文件:行号 或 URL 与检索日)。Do NOT use for: 替你决定装不装(判断位 [待人工])、执行被检件代码(只读不跑)、上架与评分。适合装别人 skill 前的初筛、同题对照体检。机检 check_review.py 五道:形制/锚/判决词/覆盖/真跑申报,零网络。五个检查面(声明层/前置层/面文承诺/样例真跑/许可与出处)。Triggers: skill 体检 / 装前检查 / 上架前审" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-03 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 1,303 lines in 17 files.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim huhoo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.