cue-paper-study-cn@0.2.27
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "学术论文研读包:给你一篇 PDF/链接,产出五段研读卡——观点逐句挂页码锚、复现清单(数据/代码/参数缺口如实标)、引用网络只列检索到的、综述脚手架留你自己的论点槽。适合「这篇论文讲什么」「帮我读这篇 PDF」「综述取材」「引用对不对」等场景。Do NOT use for: 代写或降重改写论文、编造不存在的引文与结论、替你做学术评价。Triggers: 论文研读 / 读这篇 PDF / 文献速览 / 综述骨架 / 引用核对 / 复现清单; paper reading / literature review scaffold" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-10-26 and scored it 65/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: npx invocation of non-well-known package; npx invocation of non-well-known package; npx invocation of non-well-known package. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
What would make this Verified
15 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Destructive file system command detected≈ +9 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim huhoo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +4 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +4 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.