cue-legal-research@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "用 Cue 跑「法律合规」场景的深度研究：快速检索国内法律法规与行政令原文，梳理立法背景与合规要点。覆盖企业合规风险体检、监管问询答复案例库、疑难法律实操案例库、国内法规调研、法律实务问题研判、监管处罚雷达、诉讼文书起草等核心搭子，对标发审问询与合规红线，产出带法条与类案依据、可逐条回查的合规体检与法律实务底稿。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 115 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wangxiaoxu: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.