cue-legal-practice-cases@1.0.17
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "疑难法律实操案例库 — 遇到民事、刑事纠纷拿不准怎么办?围绕你的争议点检索公开裁判文书、监管问答与实务案例,看同类案子法院怎么判、赔多少、争议焦点在哪。普通人预判官司胜算,律师办案更快更有据。 Triggers: 疑难法律、实操案例、裁判口径、类案检索、裁判规则、实务案例、争议焦点、法律实操、监管问答、判例检索、离婚、继承、劳动仲裁、借贷纠纷、交通事故、刑事辩护、legal practice cases" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-27 and scored it 62/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Privileged sudo command; Privileged sudo command. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
18 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim panting09266-ai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Privileged sudo command≈ +4 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.