cue-competitive-brief@0.3.31
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "给你主体 + 竞品清单,产出简报:结论先行(一页以内、含可执行建议),对比表每格对应证据表单元格——fact 直接可证 / inference 由多事实推导 / opinion 无可引用来源就标 opinion、置信度宁可空着不填「高」。流程硬规矩:证据表没填的维度不写进简报;结论性主张必须先进表;简报末尾列行数、置信度分布与完全没覆盖的维度。适合:尽调背景、会前准备、策略讨论。不适合:法律合规结论、非公开数据推断。 Do NOT use for: legal conclusions, non-public inference, guesses as sources." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-10-26 and scored it 75/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: npx invocation of non-well-known package; Destructive file system command detected; npx invocation of non-well-known package. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
What would make this Verified
5 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Destructive file system command detected≈ +9 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim huhoo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +4 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.