cue-cn-segment-report-cn@0.1.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "给一份年报附注或分部报告，把分部信息披露读成每条都能回到原句的台账：报告分部的识别（几个、哪几个、主次要之分、划分依据）、分部收入与利润、分部资产与负债、分部间交易与抵消、与合并报表的勾稽，逐条挂「」原句＋〔锚〕＋[S#]；分部个数与名称、主次要之分只认原句，比例与勾稽差额自算的标〔自算〕并写分子分母出处。Do NOT use for: 判断哪块业务更值钱、建议分拆或剥离、预测对股价的影响、评级与目标价。Triggers: 分部报告 / 经营分部 / 报告分部 / 分部信息 / 分部利润" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
r = subprocess.run([sys.executable, "-B", str(CHECK), "--demo"],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.return subprocess.run([sys.executable, "-B", str(args[0]), *map(str, args[1:])],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.