cue-cn-raised-funds-tracker@0.1.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "A股募集资金存续期台账:专户余额、累计投入与投入进度、募投项目变更、置换与补流、结项节余五项逐条登记,每项挂「」原句与锚;进度与比例只认披露写的,不自己除。机检五道,零网络。Do NOT use for: 定增发行条款(走 placement-terms-cn)、可转债条款(走 convertible-bond-terms-cn)、并购重组条款(走 ma-restructuring-terms-cn)、资金用途合规判断、评级目标价。Triggers: 募集资金 / 募投项目 / 专户余额 / 投入进度 / 募集资金变更" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
return subprocess.run([sys.executable, "-B", str(args[0]), *map(str, args[1:])],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.No other findings across 2,206 lines in 17 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim huhoo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.