Skills/ClawHub/cue-cn-link-to-note

cue-cn-link-to-note@0.1.5

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "链接→笔记起草：输入是一枚 URL（正文走解析通道取回本地那一份）或一份本地文件，产出是一条可直接进笔记库的 Markdown 笔记——标题、要点 3–7 条（每条一个 [S#] 锚）、至多一枚原话引用（逐字，带页码或行号）、口径与未取到、来源行（带 文件:行号 或 URL 与检索日）。机检 check_note.py 四道：形制／锚与定位／引用是否逐字回原文／缺口是否点名，零网络。适合读完一篇先落一条能回查的笔记。Do NOT use for: 整篇换格式、多源互校速览、建跨期知识包、替你决定信不信（判断位 [待人工]）。Triggers: 链接转笔记 / 一条笔记 / 带出处笔记" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher huhoo · joined 12 days agoInstalls 0Last detonated 13 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-03 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,089 lines in 14 files.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim huhoo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim huhoo