cue-cn-goodwill-impairment-risk@0.1.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "A股商誉科目专项台账：把一份年报或收购公告的商誉科目拆成八节——商誉余额、被收购标的、业绩承诺完成度、减值测试关键假设、本次计提与未计提，每行挂原句与锚；计提金额与比例只认披露原句，卡面不得拿余额减可收回金额自算。缺的逐条写未取到，两向点名。机检 check_goodwill.py 五道：形制／原句与锚／红线／未取到与不得自算／边界，零网络。Do NOT use for: 会不会减值、计提是否充分、评级与目标价、股价预测、重组事件与对价跟踪（走 cn-restructuring-tracker）。Triggers: 商誉减值 / 商誉余额 / 业绩承诺完成度 / 减值测试关键假设 / 计提比例" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,431 lines in 15 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim huhoo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.