Skills/ClawHub/cron-health-monitor

cron-health-monitor@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "主动式cron健康监控与自动修复系统:六种失败模式全覆盖(静默消失/模板展开/API耗尽/通讯静默/上下文溢出/内容腐化)+三模监控(按钉/轮询/被动)+自动修复委派。cron不会告诉你它死了——从consecutiveErrors=0时就能闻到不对劲。触发词:「cron失败」「cron健康」「定时任务监控」「c..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher ygq19901001 · publishing for 139 daysInstalls 180Last detonated 2d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 696 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,067 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ygq19901001: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim ygq19901001Propose a patch to the maintainer